heatmaps of gene expression z scores Search Results


90
GraphPad Software Inc heatmaps of gene expression z scores
Circulating inflammatory cytokines and brain tissue expression of inflammatory and apoptotic markers. Serum concentrations of IL-1β (A) , TNF-α (B) , and IL-6 (C) in the ST- and LT-LPS and CON groups. (D–K) <t>Heatmaps</t> of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of inflammatory markers in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (G–I, K) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS administration. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are represented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. (A–C) p < .05 ( ∗ ), p < .01 ( ∗∗ ), p < .0001 ( ∗∗∗∗ ). (D–F, J) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; Ctx, cortex; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; IL, interleukin; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.
Heatmaps Of Gene Expression Z Scores, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/heatmaps of gene expression z scores/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
heatmaps of gene expression z scores - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Johns Hopkins HealthCare heatmap.2 function
Circulating inflammatory cytokines and brain tissue expression of inflammatory and apoptotic markers. Serum concentrations of IL-1β (A) , TNF-α (B) , and IL-6 (C) in the ST- and LT-LPS and CON groups. (D–K) <t>Heatmaps</t> of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of inflammatory markers in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (G–I, K) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS administration. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are represented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. (A–C) p < .05 ( ∗ ), p < .01 ( ∗∗ ), p < .0001 ( ∗∗∗∗ ). (D–F, J) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; Ctx, cortex; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; IL, interleukin; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.
Heatmap.2 Function, supplied by Johns Hopkins HealthCare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/heatmap.2 function/product/Johns Hopkins HealthCare
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
heatmap.2 function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Olink Bioscience inflammation panel
Circulating inflammatory cytokines and brain tissue expression of inflammatory and apoptotic markers. Serum concentrations of IL-1β (A) , TNF-α (B) , and IL-6 (C) in the ST- and LT-LPS and CON groups. (D–K) <t>Heatmaps</t> of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of inflammatory markers in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (G–I, K) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS administration. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are represented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. (A–C) p < .05 ( ∗ ), p < .01 ( ∗∗ ), p < .0001 ( ∗∗∗∗ ). (D–F, J) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; Ctx, cortex; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; IL, interleukin; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.
Inflammation Panel, supplied by Olink Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/inflammation panel/product/Olink Bioscience
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
inflammation panel - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
TranScrip Partners notch transcriptional targets
Circulating inflammatory cytokines and brain tissue expression of inflammatory and apoptotic markers. Serum concentrations of IL-1β (A) , TNF-α (B) , and IL-6 (C) in the ST- and LT-LPS and CON groups. (D–K) <t>Heatmaps</t> of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of inflammatory markers in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (G–I, K) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS administration. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are represented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. (A–C) p < .05 ( ∗ ), p < .01 ( ∗∗ ), p < .0001 ( ∗∗∗∗ ). (D–F, J) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; Ctx, cortex; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; IL, interleukin; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.
Notch Transcriptional Targets, supplied by TranScrip Partners, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/notch transcriptional targets/product/TranScrip Partners
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
notch transcriptional targets - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
10X Genomics single cell rna-seq
Circulating inflammatory cytokines and brain tissue expression of inflammatory and apoptotic markers. Serum concentrations of IL-1β (A) , TNF-α (B) , and IL-6 (C) in the ST- and LT-LPS and CON groups. (D–K) <t>Heatmaps</t> of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of inflammatory markers in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (G–I, K) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS administration. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are represented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. (A–C) p < .05 ( ∗ ), p < .01 ( ∗∗ ), p < .0001 ( ∗∗∗∗ ). (D–F, J) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; Ctx, cortex; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; IL, interleukin; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.
Single Cell Rna Seq, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/single cell rna-seq/product/10X Genomics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
single cell rna-seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GraphPad Software Inc graphpad prism software
Identification of biomarker of response for osimertinib. ( A ) The mean logFC from the PRISM primary screen for osimertinib in HNSCC is comparable with NSCLC with EGFR mutations ( P = 0.4180). Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2  ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).
Graphpad Prism Software, supplied by GraphPad Software Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/graphpad prism software/product/GraphPad Software Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
graphpad prism software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Danaher Inc 647 abcam
Identification of biomarker of response for osimertinib. ( A ) The mean logFC from the PRISM primary screen for osimertinib in HNSCC is comparable with NSCLC with EGFR mutations ( P = 0.4180). Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2  ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).
647 Abcam, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/647 abcam/product/Danaher Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
647 abcam - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Thermo Fisher cdh2 thermo fisher scientific pa5
Identification of biomarker of response for osimertinib. ( A ) The mean logFC from the PRISM primary screen for osimertinib in HNSCC is comparable with NSCLC with EGFR mutations ( P = 0.4180). Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2  ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).
Cdh2 Thermo Fisher Scientific Pa5, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cdh2 thermo fisher scientific pa5/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdh2 thermo fisher scientific pa5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Promega cell-titer glo
Identification of biomarker of response for osimertinib. ( A ) The mean logFC from the PRISM primary screen for osimertinib in HNSCC is comparable with NSCLC with EGFR mutations ( P = 0.4180). Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2  ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).
Cell Titer Glo, supplied by Promega, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cell-titer glo/product/Promega
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell-titer glo - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Danaher Inc 488 abcam
Identification of biomarker of response for osimertinib. ( A ) The mean logFC from the PRISM primary screen for osimertinib in HNSCC is comparable with NSCLC with EGFR mutations ( P = 0.4180). Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2  ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).
488 Abcam, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/488 abcam/product/Danaher Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
488 abcam - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc h2a cell signaling technology cst12349 d6o3a
Identification of biomarker of response for osimertinib. ( A ) The mean logFC from the PRISM primary screen for osimertinib in HNSCC is comparable with NSCLC with EGFR mutations ( P = 0.4180). Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2  ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).
H2a Cell Signaling Technology Cst12349 D6o3a, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/h2a cell signaling technology cst12349 d6o3a/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
h2a cell signaling technology cst12349 d6o3a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Danaher Inc ihc pdpn abcam ab128994 epr7072
Identification of biomarker of response for osimertinib. ( A ) The mean logFC from the PRISM primary screen for osimertinib in HNSCC is comparable with NSCLC with EGFR mutations ( P = 0.4180). Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2  ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).
Ihc Pdpn Abcam Ab128994 Epr7072, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ihc pdpn abcam ab128994 epr7072/product/Danaher Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ihc pdpn abcam ab128994 epr7072 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Circulating inflammatory cytokines and brain tissue expression of inflammatory and apoptotic markers. Serum concentrations of IL-1β (A) , TNF-α (B) , and IL-6 (C) in the ST- and LT-LPS and CON groups. (D–K) Heatmaps of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of inflammatory markers in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (G–I, K) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS administration. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are represented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. (A–C) p < .05 ( ∗ ), p < .01 ( ∗∗ ), p < .0001 ( ∗∗∗∗ ). (D–F, J) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; Ctx, cortex; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; IL, interleukin; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.

Journal: Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science

Article Title: Regional Molecular Changes in Chronic Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Neuroinflammation

doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100515

Figure Lengend Snippet: Circulating inflammatory cytokines and brain tissue expression of inflammatory and apoptotic markers. Serum concentrations of IL-1β (A) , TNF-α (B) , and IL-6 (C) in the ST- and LT-LPS and CON groups. (D–K) Heatmaps of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of inflammatory markers in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (G–I, K) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS administration. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are represented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. (A–C) p < .05 ( ∗ ), p < .01 ( ∗∗ ), p < .0001 ( ∗∗∗∗ ). (D–F, J) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; Ctx, cortex; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; IL, interleukin; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.

Article Snippet: Heatmaps of gene expression z scores (see for additional information) for ST- and LT-CON and LPS-groups were generated in GraphPad Prism version 10 (GraphPad Software).

Techniques: Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Saline, Control

Brain tissue expression of apoptotic markers and H&E stained sections of rat sagittal hippocampus. (A) Heatmap of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of apoptotic markers in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (B) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are represented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. (A) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). (C, D) H&E staining of rat sagittal hippocampus (scale bars = 50 μm) after treatment with (C) saline (0.1 mL, i.p.) CON showing the normal structure, (D) LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.) showing vacuolated cells (black arrows) and immune cell infiltration (blue arrows). Bax, Bcl-2-associated X protein; Bcl2, B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 protein; Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; Ctx, cortex; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum.

Journal: Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science

Article Title: Regional Molecular Changes in Chronic Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Neuroinflammation

doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100515

Figure Lengend Snippet: Brain tissue expression of apoptotic markers and H&E stained sections of rat sagittal hippocampus. (A) Heatmap of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of apoptotic markers in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (B) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are represented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. (A) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). (C, D) H&E staining of rat sagittal hippocampus (scale bars = 50 μm) after treatment with (C) saline (0.1 mL, i.p.) CON showing the normal structure, (D) LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.) showing vacuolated cells (black arrows) and immune cell infiltration (blue arrows). Bax, Bcl-2-associated X protein; Bcl2, B-cell leukemia/lymphoma 2 protein; Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; Ctx, cortex; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum.

Article Snippet: Heatmaps of gene expression z scores (see for additional information) for ST- and LT-CON and LPS-groups were generated in GraphPad Prism version 10 (GraphPad Software).

Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Saline, Control

Brain tissue mRNA expression of neurotrophic factors and associations of molecular and behavioral outcomes in LPS treatment. Heatmaps of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of Creb (B, F) and neurotrophic markers (A, C, D, E, G, H) in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (E–H) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing the upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are presented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. ( A – D ) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). (I) Volcano plot of all behavioral and molecular data with filtering criteria of |log 2 FC| > 1.3 and p < .05, and (J) Pearson’s correlation coefficient matrix heatmap of all molecular and behavioral analysis; p < .05. B dnf , brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; C reb , cyclic-AMP response-element binding protein; Ctx, cortex; FC, fold change; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; I fn -γ, interferon gamma; I l , interleukin; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; N gf , nerve growth factor; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum.

Journal: Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science

Article Title: Regional Molecular Changes in Chronic Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Neuroinflammation

doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100515

Figure Lengend Snippet: Brain tissue mRNA expression of neurotrophic factors and associations of molecular and behavioral outcomes in LPS treatment. Heatmaps of real-time polymerase chain reaction results showing the effect of ST- and LT-LPS treatment on the mRNA expression of Creb (B, F) and neurotrophic markers (A, C, D, E, G, H) in the Hyp, Pfc, Str, Hip, Mdb, Ctx, and Cbm. (E–H) Heatmaps of the sagittal plane of the rat brain showing the upregulated or downregulated mRNA expression in the different brain regions as a result of LPS. LPS (1 mg/kg, i.p.; ST, n = 8; LT, n = 9) and saline (0.1 mL, i.p.; ST, n = 10; LT, n = 10) were administered once off (ST; n = 18) and once a week for 4 weeks (LT; n = 19). Data are presented as mean ± SD relative to the housekeeping gene Tbp . Data were analyzed using a 2-way analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s post hoc test, and heatmaps are presented as expression values ( z scores) for differentially expressed genes. ( A – D ) a ST-CON vs. ST-LPS; b ST-LPS vs. LT-LPS; c LT-CON vs. LT-LPS. p < .05 (a, b, c), p < .01 (aa, bb, cc), p < .001 (aaa, bbb, ccc), p < .0001 (aaaa, bbbb, cccc). (I) Volcano plot of all behavioral and molecular data with filtering criteria of |log 2 FC| > 1.3 and p < .05, and (J) Pearson’s correlation coefficient matrix heatmap of all molecular and behavioral analysis; p < .05. B dnf , brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Cbm, cerebellum; CON, control; C reb , cyclic-AMP response-element binding protein; Ctx, cortex; FC, fold change; Hip, hippocampus; Hyp, hypothalamus; I fn -γ, interferon gamma; I l , interleukin; i.p., intraperitoneally; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; LT, long-term; Mdb, midbrain; mRNA, messenger RNA; N gf , nerve growth factor; Pfc, prefrontal cortex; ST, short-term; Str, striatum.

Article Snippet: Heatmaps of gene expression z scores (see for additional information) for ST- and LT-CON and LPS-groups were generated in GraphPad Prism version 10 (GraphPad Software).

Techniques: Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Saline, Derivative Assay, Control, Binding Assay

Identification of biomarker of response for osimertinib. ( A ) The mean logFC from the PRISM primary screen for osimertinib in HNSCC is comparable with NSCLC with EGFR mutations ( P = 0.4180). Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2  ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Uncovering drug repurposing candidates for head and neck cancers: insights from systematic pharmacogenomics data analysis

doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03418-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification of biomarker of response for osimertinib. ( A ) The mean logFC from the PRISM primary screen for osimertinib in HNSCC is comparable with NSCLC with EGFR mutations ( P = 0.4180). Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2 ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).

Article Snippet: Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2 ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).

Techniques: Biomarker Assay, Mutagenesis, Expressing, Software, Generated

Uncovering candidate biomarkers of response and possible mechanism of intrinsic resistance towards MEKi. ( A ) Heatmap (generated using Morpheus tool: https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus/ ) with hierarchical clustering showing the drug sensitivity profile of 28 HNSCC cell lines towards all 20 MEKi. Some subclusters (in red) consisting of eight MEK inhibitors showed a largely similar pattern of sensitivity. ( B ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between MEKi-sensitive and MEKi-resistant HNSCC. ( C ) STRING network analysis of 136 significantly upregulated genes among the MEKi-sensitive cell lines, revealed enrichment of REACTOME pathway (HSA-1280215-“Cytokines signalling in immune system” [highlighted in red]. A total of 24 genes were in this Reactome pathway (unconnected nodes are hidden). ( D ) Pearson’s correlation between the gene expression of six cytokines (IL1A, SAA1, LCN2, CSF2, IL1B and CXCL1) with significant correlation with the average potential drug sensitivity against MEKi (n = 28). Graph was plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( E ) GSEA analysis of MEKi-sensitive and MEKi-resistant cell lines, with immune-related hallmark pathways being enriched among MEKi-sensitive HNSCC; While in MEKi-resistant HNSCC, hallmarks that are enriched are proliferation or cell cycle-related pathways. ( F ) Comparison of enriched hallmarks among the MEKi-resistant HNSCC, from GDSCv2 and Lepikhova datasets. The hallmarks of E2F_Targets, MYC_Targets_V2, G2M_checkpoint and spermatogenesis are consistently associated with MEKi resistance.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Uncovering drug repurposing candidates for head and neck cancers: insights from systematic pharmacogenomics data analysis

doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03418-1

Figure Lengend Snippet: Uncovering candidate biomarkers of response and possible mechanism of intrinsic resistance towards MEKi. ( A ) Heatmap (generated using Morpheus tool: https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus/ ) with hierarchical clustering showing the drug sensitivity profile of 28 HNSCC cell lines towards all 20 MEKi. Some subclusters (in red) consisting of eight MEK inhibitors showed a largely similar pattern of sensitivity. ( B ) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between MEKi-sensitive and MEKi-resistant HNSCC. ( C ) STRING network analysis of 136 significantly upregulated genes among the MEKi-sensitive cell lines, revealed enrichment of REACTOME pathway (HSA-1280215-“Cytokines signalling in immune system” [highlighted in red]. A total of 24 genes were in this Reactome pathway (unconnected nodes are hidden). ( D ) Pearson’s correlation between the gene expression of six cytokines (IL1A, SAA1, LCN2, CSF2, IL1B and CXCL1) with significant correlation with the average potential drug sensitivity against MEKi (n = 28). Graph was plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( E ) GSEA analysis of MEKi-sensitive and MEKi-resistant cell lines, with immune-related hallmark pathways being enriched among MEKi-sensitive HNSCC; While in MEKi-resistant HNSCC, hallmarks that are enriched are proliferation or cell cycle-related pathways. ( F ) Comparison of enriched hallmarks among the MEKi-resistant HNSCC, from GDSCv2 and Lepikhova datasets. The hallmarks of E2F_Targets, MYC_Targets_V2, G2M_checkpoint and spermatogenesis are consistently associated with MEKi resistance.

Article Snippet: Both the clinically responsive subset (NSCLC with EGFR mutation) ( P = 0.0005) and unselected HNSCC ( P < 0.0001) have mean logFC that are significantly lower than the subset of NSCLC without EGFR mutation. ( B ) Pearson’s correlation of EGFR ligands (AREG, TGFA, EPGN, EREG and HBEGF) or EGFR gene expression with osimertinib sensitivity in 28 HNSCC cell lines (each row is a cell line). ( C ) Average EGFR ligands expression (Z-score) is significantly correlated with osimertinib sensitivity (logFC) (Pearson’s R = -0.4949, P = 0.0087). ( D ) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) reveal significant upregulation of the TGF-beta signalling pathway among the osimertinib-resistant cell lines. ( E ) Gene expression heatmap from GSEA, showing the up-regulated genes within the TGF-beta signalling pathway. ( A ) to ( C ) were plotted using GraphPad Prism software 8.0.2. ( D ) and ( E ) were figures generated from running the GSEA modules from GenePattern 2 ( https://www.genepattern.org/ ).

Techniques: Generated, Software, Expressing